It is canon that you received your mtDNA from your mother, who received it from her mother, who received it from her mother, back through time to Mitochondrial Eve. But could that canon be wrong?
Probably not. And even if some paternal mtDNA were to “leak” into and survive in the embryo, it would happen so rarely that it could only affect things like the timing to Mitochondrial Eve and population studies, NOT genealogical research.
[New] Research from PNAS
In new research from the journal PNAS published today (“Biparental Inheritance of Mitochondrial DNA in Humans“), which is unfortunately behind a paywall, researchers identified paternally-inherited mitochondrial DNA in 17 individuals spanning three unrelated families. What is missed from the media coverage, however, is that these families were identified because member(s) were presenting with conditions that made the researchers suspect a mitochondrial disorder.
Additionally, it is important to note that this is not a novel discovery, rather a more comprehensive analysis of, and long-sought confirmation of, paternal transmission. Paternal transmission of mtDNA was first identified in 2002 in an article that was aptly named “Paternal Inheritance of Mitochondrial DNA.” In this case as well, the individual was experiencing mitochondrial disease (in his case, it was very severe). This remained one of the only, if not the only, verified case of paternally-inherited mitochondrial DNA until the most recent study (see “Paternal mtDNA transmission” at Wikipedia for more links and information).
Indeed, the paper discusses this single case, and emphasizes that many attempts in the ensuing 16 years to identify biparental mtDNA inheritance were unsuccessful:
“For over 16 y, however, no additional cases of biparental inheritance have been reported, despite efforts to turn up additional cases by several independent groups. With the advent of next-generation sequencing, this hypothesis was revisited. Ultradeep mtDNA resequencing revealed no evidence of paternal mtDNA haplotypes transmitted to offspring in humans. Furthermore, a separate review of the literature by Bandelt et al. concluded that other instances of mixed haplogroups in 20 other publications were likely due to contamination or mislabeled samples, effectively ruling out both paternal mtDNA inheritance as well as the possibility of mtDNA recombination. Results, such as these, have led many in the field to conclude that the findings in the single case report may have been due to technical issues or sample mix-up and to move on to other topics of investigation.”
This is a good sign, namely that these instances of biparental mtDNA inheritance are going to be exceedingly rare and may be limited to cases of mitochondrial disease (whether the disease causes the biparental inheritance, or vice versa, is unclear).
Indeed, the researchers suggest that the real benefit of this research will be in helping science understand the processes behind this inheritance:
“Elucidation of the molecular mechanism by which this biparental transmission occurs will expand our fundamental understanding of the process of mitochondrial inheritance and may provide an alternative approach to minimize the consequences of the transmission of pathogenic maternal mtDNA in humans.”
The supplemental information for this paper is free, and is HERE.
This research strongly suggests that while paternal inheritance of mtDNA can occur, it is extremely rare and likely co-presents with mitochondrial disease. Thus, all mtDNA research to date suggests that paternal inheritance of mtDNA will not affect genealogical research.
Be careful with the media coverage, which can omit several important facts such as the mitochondrial disease. Here are a few links, some of them a bit sensationalized by omitting the significant limitations:
- “Not Your Mom’s Genes: Mitochondrial DNA Can Come from Dad“
- “Some rare fathers pass on an extra kind of DNA to their children“
- “In Huge Shock, Mitochondrial DNA Can Be Inherited From Fathers“
just curious what the family tree looks like on these subjects?
Any cousin to cousin or brother/sister marriages that may have contributed to this situation presenting itself?
Or other paternal or maternal cross marriages. thus consolidating certain disease in the subsequent generations. Birth defects I think it is called?
In my case my dad’s MtDNA and my mother’s MtDNA happen to be the same. They are not related thru their mother’s in recent history or records. So many , many years back both of my grandmother’s MtDNA came from the same woman. ( K1a4a1a-T195c! ) Both myself and my son show up on my dad’s MtDNA matches as a 3 Genetic distance. So what does this mean? Since all three of us have the exact same MtDNA Haplogroup.
There would be some “extra” mutations (ones not used to define a haplogroup). Assuming you tested at FTDNA, you can see the list of extras on the RSRS tab. The list will be different for you and your father.
What about the pregnant woman who was going to be charged with fraud when trying to get social services for herself and her children. Because the children did not share her mtDNA. When she gave birth to the child she was carrying, they were there. The baby did not share her mtDNA. Upon further testing, it showed that the mother carried two distinct mtDNAs.
Actually, the mtDNA was the same. It was the autosomal DNA from the “vanishing twin” that made the children look like the mother’s nieces/nephews.
Liked and shared. Thank you.
I can tell you this much, I had a mtDNA test done (through FTDNA) and it showed matches to Sweden which I could have only acquired from my Mother’s father. I was expecting to find traces from the UK, because I have traced the Matriarchal line back to the 18th century. The results even showed matches to individuals from the exact town and area in Sweden from which my mother’s paternal grandmother came from.
So, while as a general rule, mitochondrial DNA may be passed from your mother, I’m not willing to just abide by what has been stated as fact, simply because ‘that is what research has shown in the past.’ At the very least, I do not have a vested interest in maintaining the belief that it is purely maternal.
Brian, what you are saying is basically impossible. The mtDNA in question probably came from 1,000 or 2,000 years ago. Perhaps you thought only your mother’s father was from Sweden, but it appears your mother’s mother’s mother’s mother’s (add another 5 or 10 or 20 or 40 of these) mother was from there as well.
It’s no longer behind a paywall:
https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/15/suppl_2/102/619761 [link to PDF there]
I have this one:
Could upload to Dropbox if wanted.
A couple more:
Comments are closed.